<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call me what you wish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/</link>
	<description>A first-grader destined for a career as a lawyer, a pre-schooler whose screams can shatter glass, a bouncing baby boy who evaded an IUD, a man who can drink his weight in Natty Light, and a woman who has long since given up caring about the condition of her kitchen floor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t call me a mommy blogger</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-242165</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t call me a mommy blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-242165</guid>
		<description>[...] I may have mentioned a time or two before that I resist labeling myself. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I may have mentioned a time or two before that I resist labeling myself. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mothergoosemouse</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-8713</link>
		<dc:creator>mothergoosemouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-8713</guid>
		<description>K, your point re kids made me think of Kari&#039;s son, the Cat.  Based on what she has written, his autism spectrum diagnosis (label) has both helped and hurt him.

I think my ultimate grievance with any sort of label is that it&#039;s subjective.  There&#039;s always a way to misinterpret it or use it against someone.  I believe I&#039;ve worn out my welcome talking about it in this forum, so I think my next post on the topic will be at The Imperfect Parent.  And it won&#039;t be about feminism, but about atheism/agnosticism/humanism, and how the struggle to find an appropriate label has gotten fairly ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K, your point re kids made me think of Kari&#8217;s son, the Cat.  Based on what she has written, his autism spectrum diagnosis (label) has both helped and hurt him.</p>
<p>I think my ultimate grievance with any sort of label is that it&#8217;s subjective.  There&#8217;s always a way to misinterpret it or use it against someone.  I believe I&#8217;ve worn out my welcome talking about it in this forum, so I think my next post on the topic will be at The Imperfect Parent.  And it won&#8217;t be about feminism, but about atheism/agnosticism/humanism, and how the struggle to find an appropriate label has gotten fairly ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-8706</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-8706</guid>
		<description>I think labels can be good or bad.

How&#039;s that?

Ha. No really. Labels to help in terms of showing a sense of belonging. and I think in some instances - particularly in grass roots movements, as well as for folks that don&#039; t have a lot of support, it&#039;s helpful. When parents don&#039;t want to classify their kids with disabilities because they don&#039;t want the labels, it doesn&#039;t help them - they don&#039;t get the attention they need often times because folks don&#039;t know what their label is. 

And then it can turn bad when the label is used against them.

Hm? Has that crossed your mind? I mean, do you not like the negative associations with the label? (And know this, I by NO MEANS thing you should be anything but yourself and what you believe - I&#039;m just continuing the banter here). 

Maybe the feminists don&#039;t need another woman. Maybe we&#039;re doing well...
Again, post coming. Damn this no wireless thing. It&#039;s cramping my style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think labels can be good or bad.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that?</p>
<p>Ha. No really. Labels to help in terms of showing a sense of belonging. and I think in some instances &#8211; particularly in grass roots movements, as well as for folks that don&#8217; t have a lot of support, it&#8217;s helpful. When parents don&#8217;t want to classify their kids with disabilities because they don&#8217;t want the labels, it doesn&#8217;t help them &#8211; they don&#8217;t get the attention they need often times because folks don&#8217;t know what their label is. </p>
<p>And then it can turn bad when the label is used against them.</p>
<p>Hm? Has that crossed your mind? I mean, do you not like the negative associations with the label? (And know this, I by NO MEANS thing you should be anything but yourself and what you believe &#8211; I&#8217;m just continuing the banter here). </p>
<p>Maybe the feminists don&#8217;t need another woman. Maybe we&#8217;re doing well&#8230;<br />
Again, post coming. Damn this no wireless thing. It&#8217;s cramping my style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domestic_Slackstress Kim</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-8701</link>
		<dc:creator>Domestic_Slackstress Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-8701</guid>
		<description>Labels always confine us. Labels can sometimes define us. If I had more than two hours of non-kid interrupted sleep I&#039;d put all this very intelligently (I hope). You get the gist. You are very articulate in your argument against subscribing to any labels. I like your style. 

You are not weak for resisting compartmentalization. But, clearly, you don&#039;t require my validation. You seem self-assured and confident already. I wish I had a few drops of the gumption you seem to embody. Thanks for lifting up my day with your strength and resolve. A Southern California SAHM who is blowing off her chores yet again to play on the momblogosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labels always confine us. Labels can sometimes define us. If I had more than two hours of non-kid interrupted sleep I&#8217;d put all this very intelligently (I hope). You get the gist. You are very articulate in your argument against subscribing to any labels. I like your style. </p>
<p>You are not weak for resisting compartmentalization. But, clearly, you don&#8217;t require my validation. You seem self-assured and confident already. I wish I had a few drops of the gumption you seem to embody. Thanks for lifting up my day with your strength and resolve. A Southern California SAHM who is blowing off her chores yet again to play on the momblogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuvDylan&#38;Holly</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-8700</link>
		<dc:creator>LuvDylan&#38;Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-8700</guid>
		<description>Julie, I see why that post would irritate you.  While I don&#039;t disagree with her assessment when it comes to some people, I don&#039;t think that applies to you.  Some people are too weak to stand up for their opinions, but you are not one of those people.  It isn&#039;t fair to lump you in with the weak just because you don&#039;t want to wear a certain label.  You made it perfectly clear why you take the stance that you do.  People shouldn&#039;t dismiss the substance of the post just because they come to a different conclusion.  If your post contained nothing more than &quot;don&#039;t worry, I&#039;m not a feminist&quot;, then I could see that person questioning the reasons behind your stance.  

And Terri, right on sista!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie, I see why that post would irritate you.  While I don&#8217;t disagree with her assessment when it comes to some people, I don&#8217;t think that applies to you.  Some people are too weak to stand up for their opinions, but you are not one of those people.  It isn&#8217;t fair to lump you in with the weak just because you don&#8217;t want to wear a certain label.  You made it perfectly clear why you take the stance that you do.  People shouldn&#8217;t dismiss the substance of the post just because they come to a different conclusion.  If your post contained nothing more than &#8220;don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;m not a feminist&#8221;, then I could see that person questioning the reasons behind your stance.  </p>
<p>And Terri, right on sista!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mom101</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-8699</link>
		<dc:creator>Mom101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-8699</guid>
		<description>Dude, call yourself anything you want. I think that&#039;s your prerogative in life. My guess however is that when people perceive a particular movement or (dreaded &quot;ism&quot;) as being something so positive and wonderful (emphasis on the word &quot;perceive&quot;) that they find it offensive that you could not want to be a part of it. I suppose it&#039;s like how a lot of &quot;proud Americans&quot; feel when someone says they&#039;re embarrassed to be an American these days. We all bring our own experiences to the party and sometimes it&#039;s hard to get out of your own head enough to see someone else&#039;s point of view. 

THe quote you mention above...I actually agree with that. But I don&#039;t think that you&#039;re included in that assessment. I think you&#039;ve been very articulate about your reasons here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, call yourself anything you want. I think that&#8217;s your prerogative in life. My guess however is that when people perceive a particular movement or (dreaded &#8220;ism&#8221;) as being something so positive and wonderful (emphasis on the word &#8220;perceive&#8221;) that they find it offensive that you could not want to be a part of it. I suppose it&#8217;s like how a lot of &#8220;proud Americans&#8221; feel when someone says they&#8217;re embarrassed to be an American these days. We all bring our own experiences to the party and sometimes it&#8217;s hard to get out of your own head enough to see someone else&#8217;s point of view. </p>
<p>THe quote you mention above&#8230;I actually agree with that. But I don&#8217;t think that you&#8217;re included in that assessment. I think you&#8217;ve been very articulate about your reasons here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mothergoosemouse</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-8698</link>
		<dc:creator>mothergoosemouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-8698</guid>
		<description>Stacey, in posing the question at the beginning of this post - why is my refusal to self-identify as a feminist bothersome - I&#039;m referring to a comment made earlier:

&quot;I have never understood people who agree with feminist goals but who are afraid to call themselves as such (that includes the matching post to this one whose arguments didn’t convince me at all). Why do I get the feeling that some women don’t self-identify as feminists because they’re afraid people might not like them or think they’re something they’re not??? Why do women care so much about whether strangers like them or agree with them???&quot;

I found this comment pretty laughable - who is this person to say that I&#039;m afraid people won&#039;t like me?  Frankly, I&#039;ve prejudiced MORE people against me by refusing to self-identify - for example, that commenter herself - than I would have by toeing the party/sisterhood line.

I was also referring to a post written by Mad Hatter Mommy - http://madhattermommy.blogspot.com/2006/10/ranty-ranty-rant.html - which expressed similar frustration with women like me, but in a much more respectful way.

And TMRP - damn straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey, in posing the question at the beginning of this post &#8211; why is my refusal to self-identify as a feminist bothersome &#8211; I&#8217;m referring to a comment made earlier:</p>
<p>&#8220;I have never understood people who agree with feminist goals but who are afraid to call themselves as such (that includes the matching post to this one whose arguments didn’t convince me at all). Why do I get the feeling that some women don’t self-identify as feminists because they’re afraid people might not like them or think they’re something they’re not??? Why do women care so much about whether strangers like them or agree with them???&#8221;</p>
<p>I found this comment pretty laughable &#8211; who is this person to say that I&#8217;m afraid people won&#8217;t like me?  Frankly, I&#8217;ve prejudiced MORE people against me by refusing to self-identify &#8211; for example, that commenter herself &#8211; than I would have by toeing the party/sisterhood line.</p>
<p>I was also referring to a post written by Mad Hatter Mommy &#8211; <a href="http://madhattermommy.blogspot.com/2006/10/ranty-ranty-rant.html" rel="nofollow">http://madhattermommy.blogspot.com/2006/10/ranty-ranty-rant.html</a> &#8211; which expressed similar frustration with women like me, but in a much more respectful way.</p>
<p>And TMRP &#8211; damn straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuvDylan&#38;Holly</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-8696</link>
		<dc:creator>LuvDylan&#38;Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-8696</guid>
		<description>Yikes!  That was a long post.  Sorry.  I wasn&#039;t trying to be a blog hog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes!  That was a long post.  Sorry.  I wasn&#8217;t trying to be a blog hog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuvDylan&#38;Holly</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-8695</link>
		<dc:creator>LuvDylan&#38;Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-8695</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know so much that people are bothered by an unwillingness for you to put a label on yourself.  Some may be, but others may just be looking to simplify your stances so they know who they are dealing with.  Some people define feminism as being pro equal rights and opportunities for women, and nothing more.  If they run into someone with that mindset, then they will just simplify and acknowledge the person being a feminist according to their definition.  If a person has the mindset to oppress women, then they will refuse to give them the label.  Some labels can be somewhat ambiguous when it comes the average person&#039;s understanding (ie. feminist, racist, chauvenist, humanist), so one person may disagree with another person&#039;s label.  Technically speaking, it isn&#039;t appropriate to admit that we are placing a label onto another person.  Everyone wants to think of themselves as a unique individual, not a one dimensional Webster&#039;s definition.  I am the same way in that I don&#039;t think I fit cleanly into any one box.  However, I know that an outsider can&#039;t grasp all the dimensions of my personality, nor are they privy to each and every one of my opinions on the intricacies of various controversial topics.  This is why they may simplify in order to get an idea of where I am coming from.  The impression I give them based on the limited insight into my mind will give them an idea of what camp I am in.  If a person is looking for a friend who wants to see a government make decisions on behalf of our nation&#039;s women, then they will know to keep looking.  Why?  Because they will say &quot;she&#039;s a feminist, I&#039;m not interested&quot;.  Maybe it is a sad thing to cut someone out of your life because of labels, but if a particular label gives strong insight into who we are, then it is a way of weeding out people whose ideals are so far from our own that we would end up with a volatile relationship (think Archie and Meathead, lol).  I am always open to different perceptions, but I may draw the line with someone who is a racist, an anti-Semite (obviously in my case), a chauvenist, religious extremist, etc.  Yes, those are labels, but they are labels that carry a lot of weight.  They tell us about a big part of a person&#039;s personality.  As long as people remember that everyone is more complex than any one issue they support, then I don&#039;t think occasional simplification is a bad thing.

BTW, Travis gets mad about the label thing when it comes to religion.  I have referred to him as leaning on the deist side of agnostic.  He doesn&#039;t like that, and therefore has told me nobody has a right to put a label on him.  That is probably the best way to define his views, but I won&#039;t taunt him with a label that he doesn&#039;t want to wear.  I only use it if someone specifically asks for insight into his belief system.  I can either say &quot;he leans to the deist side of agnostic while I lean to the atheist side of agnostic&quot;, or I could sit down for 2 hours and give them the low down of where we stand on every aspect of religion.  When people have gotten mad at my personal label and said &quot;you are an atheist&quot;, then I just say &quot;fine&quot;.  It doesn&#039;t offend me in the slightest, and if they prefer their own definition over mine, then there is nothing more I can say to convince them otherwise.  In the end, it all boils down to semantics.

Stacey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know so much that people are bothered by an unwillingness for you to put a label on yourself.  Some may be, but others may just be looking to simplify your stances so they know who they are dealing with.  Some people define feminism as being pro equal rights and opportunities for women, and nothing more.  If they run into someone with that mindset, then they will just simplify and acknowledge the person being a feminist according to their definition.  If a person has the mindset to oppress women, then they will refuse to give them the label.  Some labels can be somewhat ambiguous when it comes the average person&#8217;s understanding (ie. feminist, racist, chauvenist, humanist), so one person may disagree with another person&#8217;s label.  Technically speaking, it isn&#8217;t appropriate to admit that we are placing a label onto another person.  Everyone wants to think of themselves as a unique individual, not a one dimensional Webster&#8217;s definition.  I am the same way in that I don&#8217;t think I fit cleanly into any one box.  However, I know that an outsider can&#8217;t grasp all the dimensions of my personality, nor are they privy to each and every one of my opinions on the intricacies of various controversial topics.  This is why they may simplify in order to get an idea of where I am coming from.  The impression I give them based on the limited insight into my mind will give them an idea of what camp I am in.  If a person is looking for a friend who wants to see a government make decisions on behalf of our nation&#8217;s women, then they will know to keep looking.  Why?  Because they will say &#8220;she&#8217;s a feminist, I&#8217;m not interested&#8221;.  Maybe it is a sad thing to cut someone out of your life because of labels, but if a particular label gives strong insight into who we are, then it is a way of weeding out people whose ideals are so far from our own that we would end up with a volatile relationship (think Archie and Meathead, lol).  I am always open to different perceptions, but I may draw the line with someone who is a racist, an anti-Semite (obviously in my case), a chauvenist, religious extremist, etc.  Yes, those are labels, but they are labels that carry a lot of weight.  They tell us about a big part of a person&#8217;s personality.  As long as people remember that everyone is more complex than any one issue they support, then I don&#8217;t think occasional simplification is a bad thing.</p>
<p>BTW, Travis gets mad about the label thing when it comes to religion.  I have referred to him as leaning on the deist side of agnostic.  He doesn&#8217;t like that, and therefore has told me nobody has a right to put a label on him.  That is probably the best way to define his views, but I won&#8217;t taunt him with a label that he doesn&#8217;t want to wear.  I only use it if someone specifically asks for insight into his belief system.  I can either say &#8220;he leans to the deist side of agnostic while I lean to the atheist side of agnostic&#8221;, or I could sit down for 2 hours and give them the low down of where we stand on every aspect of religion.  When people have gotten mad at my personal label and said &#8220;you are an atheist&#8221;, then I just say &#8220;fine&#8221;.  It doesn&#8217;t offend me in the slightest, and if they prefer their own definition over mine, then there is nothing more I can say to convince them otherwise.  In the end, it all boils down to semantics.</p>
<p>Stacey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmrperry</title>
		<link>http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/comment-page-1/#comment-8694</link>
		<dc:creator>tmrperry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothergoosemouse.com/2006/10/04/call-me-what-you-wish/#comment-8694</guid>
		<description>&quot;I would be devastated to think that any of my successes were due - in whole or in part - to the fact that I’m female. I’d be happier to think that I succeeded IN SPITE OF being female. I want to earn my successes. Don’t ever LET me win. It won’t mean anything to me.&quot;

Now exchange the word &quot;female&quot; with the word &quot;hispanic&quot; or &quot;minority&quot; and that&#039;s the exact reason why I don&#039;t like affirmative action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I would be devastated to think that any of my successes were due &#8211; in whole or in part &#8211; to the fact that I’m female. I’d be happier to think that I succeeded IN SPITE OF being female. I want to earn my successes. Don’t ever LET me win. It won’t mean anything to me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now exchange the word &#8220;female&#8221; with the word &#8220;hispanic&#8221; or &#8220;minority&#8221; and that&#8217;s the exact reason why I don&#8217;t like affirmative action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
